Maps

I figured out part of the answer to the question at the end of my last post but then, started a business, closed it, got two other jobs and am now on the tail end of a personal health crisis. On the plus side I get to keep my hip . . . for now at least. Thus after a long hiatus the Mad Philosopher has returned.

So why Maps you might ask yourself. If you recall the question we are dealing with is how can we tell the difference between our ideas about reality and actual reality. Maps are part of the answer. Consider that your ideas about reality are a map of reality. Now in our age we are accustomed to highly accurate maps provided by satelite imagery, LIDAR, Arial Photography and professional Surveys. In the past this was not the case getting accurate maps was difficult if not impossible partly because of the trading advantage gained by those who had them. (They generally didn’t want to share.) Disinformation was another problem. Ancient writings are full of references to lands that the authors had never travelled too and weren’t actually sure existed. Often the descriptions and names ended up garbled as they were passed on from teller to teller before finally being recorded. Just like our modern children’s game Telephone. Apparently I could write about maps indefinitely but I think you get the picture.

Ancient mariners and traders were secretive about the information they had about how the world was really laid out because it granted them economic advantages. There are many reasons to suspect that the same thing continues today. I am here talking about Capital R “Reality” as opposed to our concepts about it. We should always be cautious of misinformation from those who are better informed than we are. ince we all have access to google earth these days the misinformation we are concerned with here is not about geography ( we are just going to ignore the flat earth society here. ) The misinformation that we are talking about has to do with how to actually succeed in the current system. There is no reason to believe that what we are told by the powerful and wealthy about how to gain success is valid. It is very reasonable at least in my opinion to suspect that any information given by the powerful and rich is calculated to get us to act in a way that is beneficial to them rather than to us.

I will end this post with the following thoughts. Where should we go to find accurate maps about reality. Perhaps we should all start learning how to make our own maps. Even the maps possessed by our progenitors are no longer accurate due to the dynamic nature of reality. I have often been told how 40 years ago it was possible to by a house for a years wages and a new car with several weeks wages. both of these data points have changed drastically in the interim. We need to learn how to maintain current accurate information on the nature of reality. This requires us to network with as many honest people around the world as possible, especially those who have different experiences and views , to share information with thus enabling us to develop a picture of reality that is as complete and accurate as possible given the obvious difficulties.

Homo Sapiens or Homo Insanus you decide.

I’ve decided to open this blog by addressing the obvious and fundamental question.

What is Insanity anyway?

The dictionary definition leaves much to be desired (available here).  It only deals with legal and clinical forms of insanity but does not address the fundamental insanity that is by far the most common.

After years of study and contemplation I propose the following definition.

Insanity:  A state of mind where one believes that one’s ideas about reality are reality.

The following quote illustrates how this works.

With our concept making apparatus called “mind” we look at reality through the ideas-about-reality which our culture gives us.  The ideas-about-reality are mistakenly labeled “reality” and unenlightened people are forever perplexed by the fact that other people, especially other cultures see “reality” differently.  It is only the ideas-about-reality which differ.  Real (capital-T True) reality is a level deeper.

Principia Discordia pp. 50

Consider the story of Ignaz Semmelweis.  He was a doctor practicing at the first obstetrical clinic at the Vienna General Hospital in the 1840’s.  Ignaz proposed that childbed fever (a common infection in women after giving birth  at the time) could be prevented if doctors washed their hands prior to delivering babies.  The idea was rejected by the medical community as it did not agree with their ideas about reality.  Ignaz eventually lost his job due to his “unreasonable” obsession with hand-washing.  Other doctors were offended by the mere thought that their hands could be considered unclean.

This case is interesting as it is now commonly accepted that washing hands before delivering babies is a good idea.  In fact a doctor who proposed otherwise would most likely lose his job.  Not washing your hands before delivering a baby would not agree with the medical community’s ideas about reality.

So the question then becomes.

how can we determine how far our ideas about reality are from reality?

Stay tuned for more . . .